I wouldn't mind being immortal...
Dec. 24th, 2007 08:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have so many things I would like to do in life, I think I need several lifetimes to do them all. Concurrent ones might be nice, but consecutive is fine too.
It occurs to me that a long-lived male person is easy to conceive of...Lazurus Long, for example. The problem with conceiving a similarly long-lived female is in reproductive timelines. Unlike men who mature sexually and pretty much stay viable and potent, women have a definite reproductive lifecycle defined by a limited number of ova, which are said to be created before she is born. Or, at least the men don't decline because of reproductive schedule, only due to overall health.
Would a long-lived female only be able to live the bulk of her life post-menopausally? Or would it imply she had an extra-big set of eggs, that her 'monthly' cycles only happened once per year, or less frequently? Were of longer duration? Would it mean she violated the rule of being born with all the ova she would ever have? Would menopause after a few hundred years of cycling mean impending death within a few decades?
How annoying it is that men could easily be supposed to be long lived and fully potent for their duration, but to have an immortal woman be believable requires one to consider her reproductive stage. Well, I guess really it requires *me* to consider it. I can't help it that I must critically examine ideas. Truly I can't.
I heard somewhere (I believe it was a Frazz strip, bolstered by Roald Dahl's Matilda, I suppose), that mammals have a certain number of heart beats in their lifetimes and then they are done. Which explains why exercise is so good for longevity, because although heart rates peak during exercise, it also causes a slower heart beat at rest.
To paraphrase George Carlin, these are things I think about when the computer is downloading and my family are asleep (so I can't make too much noise).
p.s. I keep thinking I need to write down some of these ideas in a file and start writing short stories.
p.p.s. I did finally start reading The Ode Less Traveled by Stephen Fry this morning. Maybe poetry first. Then later, I can tackle drawing, painting, photography, sailing, fencing, aikido, tai chi, game design, juggling, calligraphy, paper making, baking, science reporting, essay writing, mountain climbing, and all the other hobbies I would like to pursue but don't have time for.
It occurs to me that a long-lived male person is easy to conceive of...Lazurus Long, for example. The problem with conceiving a similarly long-lived female is in reproductive timelines. Unlike men who mature sexually and pretty much stay viable and potent, women have a definite reproductive lifecycle defined by a limited number of ova, which are said to be created before she is born. Or, at least the men don't decline because of reproductive schedule, only due to overall health.
Would a long-lived female only be able to live the bulk of her life post-menopausally? Or would it imply she had an extra-big set of eggs, that her 'monthly' cycles only happened once per year, or less frequently? Were of longer duration? Would it mean she violated the rule of being born with all the ova she would ever have? Would menopause after a few hundred years of cycling mean impending death within a few decades?
How annoying it is that men could easily be supposed to be long lived and fully potent for their duration, but to have an immortal woman be believable requires one to consider her reproductive stage. Well, I guess really it requires *me* to consider it. I can't help it that I must critically examine ideas. Truly I can't.
I heard somewhere (I believe it was a Frazz strip, bolstered by Roald Dahl's Matilda, I suppose), that mammals have a certain number of heart beats in their lifetimes and then they are done. Which explains why exercise is so good for longevity, because although heart rates peak during exercise, it also causes a slower heart beat at rest.
To paraphrase George Carlin, these are things I think about when the computer is downloading and my family are asleep (so I can't make too much noise).
p.s. I keep thinking I need to write down some of these ideas in a file and start writing short stories.
p.p.s. I did finally start reading The Ode Less Traveled by Stephen Fry this morning. Maybe poetry first. Then later, I can tackle drawing, painting, photography, sailing, fencing, aikido, tai chi, game design, juggling, calligraphy, paper making, baking, science reporting, essay writing, mountain climbing, and all the other hobbies I would like to pursue but don't have time for.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 02:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 04:19 pm (UTC)http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/44641.php
https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2006/NR-06-06-01.html
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 04:30 pm (UTC)Although if we look at long lived women today, those that are over 100, then I wouldn't say the bulk of it was post-menopausal, but there is the potential there currently.
It is entirely my goal to live to be over 200. Goals are good to have. If I thought I could make it to 400 or 500 I would totally try!
I am not very good with bible verses, but there is one my grandmother used to quote, "Those who love life, lose it, those who hate life keep it." I never understood it until I hit my mid twenties and my mortality started to creep in and I realized..ooh yeah I am not indestructible. Somewhere in there I had this epiphany, that the quote is akin to the glass half empty or half full. It all in the perception. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 04:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 12:15 am (UTC)swift