Make your perspective known!
Jan. 18th, 2006 02:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As a follow up to my recent post (which was reposted from
djinnthespazz) about President Bush's quote saying that wiretaps need a court order while apparently ordering warrantless wiretaps...
moveon.org is currently gathering electronic signatures for a petition on this very issue. If you are as concerned as I about the actions of the Bush administration, please consider signing this petition!!! Here is information from moveon:
Subject: The President Broke the Law
President Bush admitted to personally authorizing thousands of allegedly illegal wiretaps, and he doesn't plan to stop. Circumventing the Constitution is serious business. This is a big moment. People from across the political spectrum are standing together to protect the rule of law and the principles that are core to our identity as Americans.
Can you sign this petition to show Congress that Americans want a thorough investigation of the president's secret wiretapping program?
http://political.moveon.org/ruleoflaw/
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
moveon.org is currently gathering electronic signatures for a petition on this very issue. If you are as concerned as I about the actions of the Bush administration, please consider signing this petition!!! Here is information from moveon:
Subject: The President Broke the Law
President Bush admitted to personally authorizing thousands of allegedly illegal wiretaps, and he doesn't plan to stop. Circumventing the Constitution is serious business. This is a big moment. People from across the political spectrum are standing together to protect the rule of law and the principles that are core to our identity as Americans.
Can you sign this petition to show Congress that Americans want a thorough investigation of the president's secret wiretapping program?
http://political.moveon.org/ruleoflaw/
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 09:27 pm (UTC)Bushism...
Date: 2006-01-19 12:46 am (UTC)I might not find it funny in a week. We're about to elect someone who seems to have his head lodged somewhere up Bush's nether regions, I fear. But still, people bent this far from straight, sometimes a good mocking is all you can do.
Re: Bushism...
Date: 2006-01-24 01:27 am (UTC)Re: Bushism...
Date: 2006-01-24 07:24 am (UTC)Minority Government in a non-two-party system, in case you're not familiar with the idea, means that the Government can't pass bills without working things out with at least one of the other parties because they've less than half the seats; failure passing a required vote and the government resigns, too, so they have to play nice. So, all in all, not as bad as it could have been.
The up side is that our satirists (if that's a real word) can look forward to a lot of material in the near future, I suppose.
Re: Bushism...
Date: 2006-01-24 09:22 pm (UTC)I have passing familiarity with Parlimentary government...mainly from having Canadian friends over the years, watching and hearing BBC (our local NPR station has an hour of BBC World News every morning and the PBS station here has BBC TV news in the evening, though I hardly ever watch that), and the references in cultural stuff such as Dr. Who. Living in SE Michigan means I even watch CBC sometimes...much better Olympics coverage than US networks, Saturday am curling when I was a kid, etc.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure 'satirists' IS a real word.